Running Agile

A Practitioner's View To Lean & Agile

Archive for the ‘Productivity’ Category

Sustainability Role Models

Posted by Christophe on March 3, 2009

So an agile team strives to work at a sutainable pace.

Great.

It’s even in the agile manifesto -well, on the second page:
Agile processes promote sustainable development. The sponsors, developers, and users should be able to maintain a constant pace indefinitely.

But what about the managers? and the executive layer?

According to a new book, Elsewhere USA (Dalton Conley), things have dramatically changed in the past few decades:

  • In the 60s, professional success translated into increased wealth and more leisure time for people and their family
  • Today, professional success doesn’t. Instead, people end up working more hours and feel higher  anxiety

elsewhere-usa-book

Excerpt from the book description:

Boundaries between leisure and work, public space and private space, and home and office have blurred and become permeable. How many of us now work from home, our wireless economy allowing and encouraging us to work 24/7? How many of us talk to our children while scrolling through e-mails on our BlackBerrys? How many of us feel overextended, as we are challenged to play multiple roles–worker, boss, parent, spouse, friend, and client–all in the same instant?

Conley shows that the higher the position, the more people feel their work is intangible, pushing them to work longer and longer hours, everywhere, all the time. He doesn’t condemned the practice, but rather tell people to accept and live with it.

So here’s a question:

Given that

  • employees do what the boss does -a simple mimic mechanism or a conscious action to avoid being in trouble
  • over utilized people produce less than people that have some
  • all systemic conflicts are the result of unexamined assumptions (root causes)
  • overall throughput can be only be increased by increasing the throughput at the bottleneck process

Are executives really helping their company when working 24/7?

dilbert-spare-time

Posted in Books, Dilbert, Leadership, Productivity, Theory of Constraints | Tagged: , , , , , | 4 Comments »

How good are you at single tasking?

Posted by Christophe on January 7, 2009

jugglerPeople believe they can multitask.

Managers want their team members to multitask.

“Give me a specific example when you had to mul-i tasks with a lot of projects” is a common recommended interview question by job interview secrets books. Google shows 300,000 results. Jobbankusa.com gives the expected answerAnswer Guide: Applicant should have the ability to problem solve, handle competing priorities, be able to multi-task and have the ability to effectively process and re-organize planning structures to ensure a successful conclusion.

Jeff Atwood at codinghorror.com gives a whole different perspective in his article “The Multi-Tasking Myth“: you lose 20% of your time for each additional task done in parallel.

A recent study from Danish researchers proved that even for something as automated as walking we have to actually think just to stay upright. This significantly prevented septuagenarians from doing simple math while walking.

The  metaphor of juggling is frequently used to represent the idea of multi-tasking. This is ironical, since jugglers do one task only: rotating balls in the air.

With pressure for getting more stuff done and constant harassment from the environment (emails, IMs, phone calls), multi-tasking is eating organization productivity alive.

multitasking

Put your phone on DND, shut down outlook, close your messenger. Pick one project – a small one, very small one – and get it done.

And next time you interview someone, ask them “how good are you at single tasking?”

Posted in Productivity, Recruiting, Research | Tagged: , , , , | 2 Comments »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.